Jessil v. Jose Rajappan
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was settled through mediation. The impugned decree was vacated and a new decree was passed in terms of the mediation settlement agreement, which was appended to the judgment.
What did the court decide?
The impugned decree was vacated; a decree passed per mediation settlement agreement; court fee refunded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013/29TH SRAVANA, 1935
RFA.No.473 of 2006 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.110/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, NORTH PARAVUR, DATED 31-08-2005
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: --------------------
JESSIL, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.KAITTER, PUTHIYA VEETTIL, GOTHURUTH KARA, CHENNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR SMT.V.SHYLAJA
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
JOSE RAJAPPAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.ALLESU, PAINADATH VEETTIL, KADAVATHURUTH KARA, GOTHURUTH, CHENNAMANGALAM VILLAGE, PARAVUR TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jessil
- respondent
Jose Rajappan
Coram
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court