The petitioners challenged the Family Court's order denying custody of a minor child. During hearing, the parties reached a settlement which was produced and signed by both sides. The Court recorded the settlement terms and disposed of the main order based on this agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2013/19TH CHAITHRA 1935
OP (FC).No. 1346 of 2013 (R)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN IA NO.129/2013 IN IA NO.1828/2012 IN OP.1109/2012 OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 13-03-2013
PETITIONER(S):
SHAHIDA, AGED 38 YEARS D/O. AHAMED, 'SREE MURUKA', NEAR BYE PASS OPPOSITE AROOR CHURCH, AROOR, PIN-688534.
BY ADV. SMT.S.KARTHIKA
RESPONDENT(S):
IBRAHIM, AGEGD 48 YEARS, S/O. MAKKAR, A CHIRAKKAL HOUSE, KUMBALAM COCHIN-682504.
BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH
THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-04-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP (FC).No. 1346 of 2013 (R) -----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'(S) EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A. 129/12 IN OP NO. 1109/2012 ON THE FILES OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXHIBIT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN I.A. 129/13 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM.
EXHIBIT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13-3-13 IN I.A. 129/2013 IN IA NO.1828/2012 IN O.P. 1109/12 ON THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM.
RESPONDENT'(S) EXHIBITS: NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
BKA
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ.
-------------------------------------------------OP (FC) No. 1346 of 2013
Dated this the 9th day of April, 2013
J U D G M E N T
T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
The petitioner herein and the respondent have got married together.
We record the terms of settlement and the OP (FC) is disposed of in terms of settlement, which will form part of this judgment.
Sd/-
T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE.
bka/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an application challenging the Family Court's denial of custody.
Shahida
Ibrahim
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
