Bhargavan v. Sunny
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India requesting issuance of a carbon copy of a subordinate order and stay of registration. The court held the petition infructuous as the carbon copy was issued and the stay period had expired.
What did the court decide?
The original petition is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/8TH KARTHIKA, 1935
OP(C).No. 176 of 2013 (O)
PETITIONER(S):
BHARGAVAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, PADMASREE, AALIYADU, NEDUMANGADU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
RESPONDENT(S):
1. SUNNY,
- S/O.BHARGAVAN, THIRUVONAM, VENJARAMOODU, NELLANDU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST 695 607.
2. SONY, S/O.BHARGAVAN, THIRUVONAM, VENJARAMOODU, NELLANDU VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST 695 607.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the original petition for issuing a carbon copy and staying registration is maintainable once the carbon copy has been issued and the stay order has expired.
Whether the original petition is infructuous given that the request was granted belatedly and the interim stay is no longer in force.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BHARGAVAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN
- respondent
SUNNY
- respondent
SONY
- respondent
THE SUB REGISTRAR
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court