Thankappan Nair v. B.Prasannakumari
Case brief
What is this about?
Matrimonial appeal closed without examining merits due to lack of representation by the appellant. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
&
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/29TH MAGHA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 192 of 2006 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP.194/1998 of FAMILY COURT,TRIVANDRUM
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT::
THANKAPPAN NAIR,
S/O.KRISHNA PILLAI AGED 54 YEARS KUNNATHUMELE PUTHENVEEDU, PAYATTUVILA KOTTUKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.T.A.NARAYANAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS:
R1 TO 3 BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-022013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE & P.D.RAJAN,JJ.
Mat.Appeal No.192 of 2006
--------------------------------------------Dated 18th February, 2013
JUDGMENT
Pius.C.Kuriakose,J.
Read order dated 13/2/2013. Today also there is no representation for the appellant. Appeal is closed without examining the merits of the grounds.
(PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE) JUDGE.
(P.D.RAJAN) JUDGE.
uj.
THANKAPPAN NAIR
B.PRASANNAKUMARI
PRATHIBHA P.NAIR
PRAJITHA P.NAIR
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
P.D.RAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court