The Tribunal ought to have taken note of this fact while considering the question regarding awarding compensation under the head, medical expenses. So feel that awarding an amount of 5,000/- instead of 1,000/- will be reasonable and we award that amount under the head, medical expenses. The appellant was aged 10 years at the time of the accident. He suffered fracture of shaft femur left along with other injuries. He was treated as inpatient for 30 days. Being a child of that tender age, he might have suffered severe pain and the amount of 4,000/- awarded by the Tribunal appears to be on the lower side. We enhance the same to 10,000/-. Similarly, the amount awarded under the head, loss of amenities in life, is also on the lower side. So we award 7,000/- under that head instead of 1,000/- awarded by the Tribunal. We do not find any reason to interfere with the amounts awarded by the Tribunal under the other heads as the amounts awarded by the Tribunal under the other heads are just and proper. In all, the appellant will be entitled to get additional compensation of ` 16,000/- over and above what has been awarded by the Tribunal, which the
