Balakrishnan v. James
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant sought and obtained permission to withdraw the motor accident claims appeal. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with no substantive adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the M.A.C.A. Allowed. M.A.C.A. dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/12TH MAGHA 1934
MACA.No. 182 of 2013 ()
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV.1298/2006 of SPL.COURT FOR EC ACT CASES &MACT,TSR DATED 09-10-2012
APPELLANT(S):
BALAKRISHNAN
S/O.SANKUNNY EZHUTHACHAN THENGUVALAPPIL HOUSE MADAKKATHARA THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJAN MANNALI
SRI.M.P.JAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
Parties & counsel
- appellant
BALAKRISHNAN
- respondent
JAMES
- respondent
DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL CADETS CORPS(NCC)
- respondent
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO DEFENCE DEPARTMENT
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court