So we are not inclined to enhance the percentage of disability taken by the Tribunal for awarding compensation under the head loss of earning power. But there is some force in the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent that he was aged 38 years and the proper multiplier is 15 and not 16 taken by the Tribunal in view of the dictum laid down in Sarla Verma and others V. Delhi Transport Corporation and others (2010(2) KLT 802 (SC) . If the recalculation is made by taking the income as Rs.3,000/- per month 7% disability and multiplier as 15, then he will be entitled to get an amount of Rs.37,800/(3000x12x15x7%) under the head loss of earning power instead of Rs.26,880/- awarded by the Tribunal and we award this amount under that head. Considering the fact that the Tribunal has accepted 7% disability for the purpose of calculating compensation under head loss of earning capacity and also convinced that the acromio clavicular dislocation had caused stiffness, he will have to be this difficulty for the remaining period of life. This may have some impact in his personal life as well. So, we are inclined to enhance the compensation payable under the head loss of amenities to Rs.15,000/- from Rs.8,000/-. Similarly, we are inclined to enhance the compensation payable
