Land acquisition appeal questioning enhanced compensation value fixed by reference court. Court held interference not warranted considering land extent and enhancement given.
Appeal dismissed; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013/20TH BHADRA, 1935
LA.App..No. 401 of 2013 ()
ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LAR 131/2009 of SUB COURT, CHENGANNUR DATED 09-042010
APPELLANT(S)/IST RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA)RAILWAYS KAYAMKULAM.
BY ADVS.GOVERNMENT PLEADER:SRI A J JOSE
RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANT & 2ND RESPONDENT :
1. KALYANIAMMA SANTHAMMA, KULATHOOR, PADINJARETHIL VEEDU, PULIYOOR MURI PULIYOOR VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK-689510.
2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, ERNAKULAM SOUTH-682011.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL) R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.R.DILEEP R1 BY ADV. SRI.MANU SEBASTIAN R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOHN MATHEW,SC, RAILWAYS
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-09-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
=========================
L.A.A.No.401 of 2013
============================ Dated this the 11th day of September, 2013
J U D G M E N T
Respondent appears through counsel.
16,776/- per Are while the reference court fixed land value at 61,750/- per Are. The State is aggrieved.L.A.A.No.401 of 2013
2
road access.
This appeal is dismissed.
All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.
Sd/-
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE
Sbna
True Copy
P A to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interference is required in the La Appell not inclined to think that interference in appeal is required given the consideration of land extent and enhancement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shaji Kuriakose Vs. Indian Oil CorporationReferred¶6
Shaji Kuriakose Vs. Indian Oil Corporation (2002(1) KLT 381)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
STATE OF KERALA RE: SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA) RAILWAYS KAYAMKULAM
KALYANIAMMA SANTHAMMA
THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, ERNAKULAM SOUTH
THOMAS P.JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court