Sudhakaran v. Asokan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Supreme Court-appointed appellate division judge dismissed the first appeal as the appellant had no instructions, resulting in procedural dismissal without adjudication on merits or legal propositions.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed due to lack of instructions from the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/27TH PHALGUNA 1934
FAO.No. 214 of 2009 ( )
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN I.A.6649/2008 IN OS.1232/2008 of I ADDL.SUB COURT, THRISSUR DATED 29-11-2008
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
SUDHAKARAN,AGED 55 YEARS,
S/O.KIZHAKKINIYATH VELAYUDHAN, PARAKKAD VILLAGE ARIMBUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.A.SATHEESA BABU
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SUDHAKARAN
- respondent
K.G.ASOKAN
- respondent
SUJATHA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court