Aneesh R. Pillai v. Grigory
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed an execution second appeal based on a compromise agreement signed at a mediation centre. The court directed the execution court to set aside a previously confirmed sale.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Execution Court to set aside the confirmed sale of the property.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/30TH MAGHA 1934
Ex.SA.No. 20 of 2012 ()
AS.182/2011 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLLAM OS.343/2002 of PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE, KOLLAM
APPELLANT(S) (APPELLANTS IN AS 182/11 AND CLAIMANTS IN EA 136/2010 IN EP 428/08 IN OS 343/02) :-
1. ANEESH R. PILLAI, S/O.LATE RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, ANEESH BHAVAN, MULLAKERI MURI, VADAKKUMTHALA, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK.
2. ASHA S PILLAI, S/O.LATE RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI, ANEESH BHAVAN, MULLAKERI MURI, VADAKKUMTHALA, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK.
REP. BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ANEESH R PILLAI).
BY ADVS.SRI.ALEX N.MATHEW (KOLLAM)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aneesh R. Pillai
- appellant
Asha S Pillai
- respondent
Grigory
- respondent
Saraswathy Amma
- respondent
Shaji Antony
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court