Subhadra v. Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision against dismissal of execution petition for alleged violation of decreed injunction. Court found no infirmity in execution court's finding that violation was not proved. Revision dismissed; admission order allows further proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Dismissing the Civil Revision Petition (C.R.P. No. 399 of 2012).
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/25TH MAGHA 1934
CRP.No. 399 of 2012 (C)
E.P. No.165/210 IN OS.90/1984 of MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
SUBHADRA
D/O.KRISHNAN, CHANDANAPARAMBIL, VADAKKUMBRAM AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.SAJU.S.A SMT.P.A.SHEEJA SMT.MEENA.A. SRI.K.C.KIRAN
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT:
NARAYANAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the execution court erred in finding no violation of the prohibitory injunction decree warranting proceedings.
Whether the civil revision petition warrants interference regarding the execution court's finding.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subhadra
- respondent
Narayanan
Coram
Thomas P. Joseph
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court