Dismissed

Rajan and Others v. State of Kerala & Another

Kerala HC23 Jul 2013Crl.MC/276/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their Criminal Miscellaneous Case and immediately dismissed it as withdrawn. Petitioners were granted liberty to file applications for discharge before the lower court via counsel in their absence.

What did the court decide?

Crl.M.C dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file applications for discharge in lower court via counsel.

Rajan and Others Vs State of Kerala & Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Kerala HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2013/1ST SRAVANA, 1935

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 276 of 2008 ( )

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CP 40/2007 of J.M.F.C.-I,THRISSUR

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 5:

¶8

RAJAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.ANTHONY, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM PERINGAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶9

FILO, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.RAJAN, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM PERINGAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶10

RENJU RAJ, AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM PERINGAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶11

DEEPU RAJ, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA, DESOM PERINGAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶12

JAYARAJ, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.RAJAN, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM PERINGAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.S.RAJEEV

¶14

COMPLAINANT(S)/STATE AND COMPLAINANT:

¶15

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶16

SUNNY, S/O.ANTHONY, THEKKEKARA ESTATE, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA DESOM, PERINGAVU, VILLAGE THRISSUR TALUK.

¶17

R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHEEBA.M.T R2 BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-07-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

¶20

B. KEMAL PASHA, J

¶21

Crl.M.C.No. 276 of 2008

¶22

Dated this the 23^rd day of July, 2013

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this Crl.M.C with leave to file an application for discharge, before the court below.

¶25

Permission is granted. This Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate applications before the court below seeking discharge, if they are entitled to. The court below shall entertain such applications, in the absence of the petitioners, provided, they are duly represented by their learned counsel.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

B. KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE

¶28

¶29

/True Copy/

¶30

P.A to Judge

Rajan and Others v. State of Kerala & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan and Others v. State of Kerala & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumari @ Vellachi Vs State of Kerala

Chunda @ Velayudhan Vs State of Kerala

Narayanan Vs State of Kerala

State of Kerala Vs Sebastian.B

Dharmappa Shettigara @ Narayana Shettiga Vs State of Kerala

K.Madhava Vs State