Ismail Kunju v. Abdul Salam
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal appeal was dismissed as not pressed, as the appellant's counsel submitted there was no instruction because the appellants were deceased.
What did the court decide?
The criminal appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
CRL.A.No. 587 of 2002 (E)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 240/1991 of C.J.M.,KOLLAM DATED 05-02-2002
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT::
ISMAILKUNJU, YOUSUF KUNJU, PUTHENPURAYILVEEDU, VADAKKEVILA P.O., ERAVIPURAM VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED & STATE::
- ABDUL SALAM, VELIYIL PURAYIDAM, PANDHRANDUMURI, THATTAMALA, ERAVIPURAM.
- ABOOBACKER, THAHIRA MANZIL, THODIYIL, KAYYALAKKAL, ERAVIPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
ISMAILKUNJU
- appellant
YOUSUF KUNJU
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
ABDUL SALAM
- respondent
ABOBACKER
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court