A.v.Thomas v. Mrs.Shiny Mathew @ Shiny Jimmy
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/21ST PHALGUNA 1934
CRL.A.No. 519 of 2006 (F)
Crl.L.P..105/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 16-02-2006
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC.254/2003 of J.M.F.C., ETTUMANOOR DATED 30-12-2005
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
A.V.THOMAS, ANNADICKAL HOUSE, MOOZHIKULANGARA P.O., VIA. NEENDOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDY JOSEPH
RESPONDENT/ACCUSED:
MRS.SHINY MATHEW @ SHINY JIMMY, W/O.JIMMY, NARAYANA HRUDAYALALA PVT LTD. INDUSTRIAL AREA, HOSUR ROAD, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-562 158 FROM VADAKKEPARAMBIL HOUSE, VALACHIRA KARA, KADUTHURUTHY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-03-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
------------------------------------Crl.A.No.519 of 2006
Dated this the 12th day of March, 2013
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted on instructions that the appellant is not in a position to find out the correct address of the respondent so as to serve notice on her who sold her property and left the place. Therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant has also submitted that he is not in a position to proceed with the appeal after curing the defect.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE
skj
True copy
P.A. to Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be proceeded with when the appellant cannot serve notice on the respondent due to her absence from the place.
A.V.THOMAS
MRS.SHINY MATHEW @ SHINY JIMMY
V.K.MOHANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court