Tennsi Joseph v. Nabeera Beegum
Case brief
What is this about?
This court closed the contempt of court case pending the disposal of the writ appeal, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the court again if necessary after the appeal's outcome.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed with liberty to the petitioner to move afresh after the disposal of the Writ Appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/2ND KARTHIKA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 828 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).13018/2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 13018/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 05-06-2013
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
TENNIS JOSEPH, AGED 40 YEARS S/O JOSEPH, THEKKETHOTTIYIL HOUSE, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
NABEERA BEEGUM, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SUB REGISTRAR, NILAMBUR MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 329
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tennis Joseph
- respondent
Nabeera Beegum
- respondent
Sub Registrar, Nilambur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court