The court held a contempt case closed with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition against proper authorities since the named respondent no longer holds office or is not present in the relevant station.
Liberty to the petitioner to move afresh impleading proper persons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 253 of 2012 (S) IN WP(C).15414/2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 15414/2009 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
PAUL T.KURIAN S/O. LATE T.E. KURIAKOSE, THURUTHUMMEL HOUSE VADACODE P.O. KANGARAPADY, KOCHI 682021
BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
SHANAVAS (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER FORT KOCHI - 682 001.
BY ADV.SUJITH MATHEW JOSE, SPECIAL GOVT. PLEADER TO
ADDL. AG-I.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
Cont. Case (C) No.253 of 2012
Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The respondent has appeared in person. The
respondent did not hold office at the time Annexure-A judgment was rendered. The respondent does not hold office in the present
station even now.
The Contempt Case is hence closed with liberty to the
petitioner to move afresh impleading the proper persons.
V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.
Paul T.Kurian
Shanavas
V. Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
