A.Radhakrishnan Nair v. Sri.K.G.Mohanlal
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court petition regarding compliance with a prior judgment on pension benefits, the Court found that the respondents substantially complied with directions. The case was closed, though an option for further representation was outlined.
What did the court decide?
The Contempt of Court Case is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2013/14TH ASHADHA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 160 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).14108/2006
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14108/2006 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 29.6.2012
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN THE WPC:
A.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 57 YEARS S/O LATE APPUKUTTAN PILLAI, PUMP OPERATOR (RETIRED) K.S.R.T.C. VIZHINJAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT RESIDING AT KARTHIKA GOVINDA MANGALAM URUTTAMBALAM (P.O) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695507
BY ADVS.SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J.
SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM)
SRI.K.R.GANESH
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR
- respondent
SRI.K.G.MOHANLAL
- respondent
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court