This order is from the High Court of Kerala. The court closed a contempt case upon hearing counsel for the petitioner, who submitted that judgment in the underlying writ petition had been complied with by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/30TH MAGHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 116 of 2013 (S) IN WP(C).1986/2011
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).1986/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DT. 21.12.2011
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
GOKUL DAS .C., S/O.CHANDRA BABU, AGED 21 YEARS, MALAYIL HOUSE, VALLIKODE P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689 648.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
SRI.C.R.REGHUNATHAN SRI.M.V.ASHIM
SRI.B.HARRYLAL
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, PLOT NO.1630-A, J BLOCK, XV MAIN ROAD, 6TH STREET, ANNA NAGAR WEST, CHENNAI-600 040.
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)
R1 BY ADV.SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN R2 BY ADV.SRI.SAJJU.S
ADV. SRI.K.SHAJ
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC 116/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXTS.:
ANNEXURE 1: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.1986/2011 DATED 21.12.2011.
ANNEXURE 2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SEND BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, ENCLOSING THE ORIGINAL MARK LIST AND PASS CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER, SEEKING CORRECTIONS.
ANNEXURE 3: TRUE COPY OF THE REMAINDER LETTER DATED 6.8.2012.
RESPONDENTS' EXTS.: NIL.
Srd
(True copy)
P.S. To Judge.
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
Contempt Case(c) No.116 of 2013
Dated this the 19th day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter was taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the judgment has been complied with. It is stated that certificate was issued by the respondents and that the same has been received by the petitioner.
In view of the submissions so made, the Contempt
Case is closed.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
GOKUL DAS .C.
N.NAGARAJU
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
PRINCIPAL ROSE DALE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
