The court considered a contempt petition arising from a writ petition. The respondent submitted that prior directions were complied with, a fact uncontested by the petitioner. The court recorded the submission, found no need for further proceedings, and closed the matter.
Matter closed; no further proceedings required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/21ST KARTHIKA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 1121 of 2013 (S)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4587/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA .
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN WPC NO. 4587/2013.:
SANTHAKUMARI AMMA, AGED 73 YEARS W/O. SIVASANKARA PILLAI, SANTHA SADANAM, PALLICKATHODU ANICKAD.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686503.
BY ADVS.SRI.SIBY MATHEW
SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN WPC NO. 4587/2013:
ALEX JOSEPH, AGED NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER , ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM-686001.
BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
tss
C.O.C. NO.1121/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES
A1:- COPY OF JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) NO.4587/2013 DTD. 20.6.2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.
A2:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD. 31.7.2013 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
A3:- COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DTD.16.8.2013 SENT TO THE RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES
NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
tss
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE © No. 1121 of 2013 IN W.P.(C)No. 4587 OF 2013
Dated this the 12th November, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the
direction given by this Court as per Annexure-A1 judgment has already been complied with. The factual position is not rebutted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. In the said circumstance, this Court finds that no further proceedings are required to be followed. Submission made from the part of the respondent is recorded and the matter is closed.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE
lk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the direction issued by the Court in the original writ petition was complied with.
Santhakumari Amma
Alex Joseph
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
