The High Court of Kerala dismissed the bail application of the first accused, holding that the nature of the offence, manner of commission, injuries, weapons used, and infant investigation stage precluded granting bail under extraordinary jurisdiction.
Bail application dismissed; petitioner not granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/24TH PHALGUNA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 1764 of 2013 ()
CRIME NO. 180/2013 OF SASTHAMCOTTA POLICE STATION , KOLLAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.I
AKHIL, AGED 19 YEARS S/O.THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, THADATHIL, VADAKKETHI PANAPPETTI MURI, SASTHAMCOTTA VILLAGE
BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.ROY THOMAS
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-03-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
tss
P. BHAVADASAN, J.
B.A. No.1764 of 2013
Dated this the 15th day of March, 2013.
ORDER
Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. 180 of 2013 of Sasthamcotta Police Station, who is alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 294(b) and 506(ii) read with Section 149 I.P.C.
B.A.1764/2013
2
cannot be accepted. There are materials to show his
involvement. Moreover the incident has taken place at 11 p.m.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE
sb.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the first accused in offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 323, 324, 294(b), and 506(b) IPC read with Section 149 IPC.
Whether the investigation stage precludes the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction in favour of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akhil
State of Kerala
P. Bhavadan, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
