Rahul v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala allowed a bail application, recording the applicant's counsel's submission that he is not arrayed as an accused in the underlying crime, and consequently closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed based on submission that applicant is not arrayed as an accused.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY 2013/3RD MAGHA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 153 of 2013 ()
CRIME NO. 561/2012 OF ARTHUNKAL POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
APPLICANT(S)/ACCUSED:
RAHUL, AGED 18 YEARS, S/O.LATE SEBASTIAN,VAZHAKOOTTATHIL HOUSE, MARARIKULAM NORTH.P.O,ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JAMES
RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARTHUNKAL POLICE STATION,CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Sub Inspector of Police, Arthunkal Police Station
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court