Renjith v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order where the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the bail application, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/20TH PHALGUNA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 1448 of 2013 ()
CRIME NO. 2209/2012 OF NORTH PARUR POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:
RENJITH, SON OF RAMANAN, AGED 23 YEARS, ARIPPADAM HOUSE THATHAPPILLY KARA, MANNAM P.O., KOTTUVALLY VILLAGE N.PARAVOOR.
BY ADVS.SRI.A.CHERIAN SRI.NAVEEN THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NORTH PARAVOOR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLICPROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RENJITH
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
P.BHAVADASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court