Anto Mamkootam v. the Secy., Peruvamthanam Service Co.Op.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN &
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/23RD MAGHA 1934
AS.No. 229 of 1997 (G)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS.342/1994 of SUB COURT, PALA DATED 28-10-1995
APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
ANTO MAMKOOTTAM, S/O VARGHESE, RESIDING AT MAMKOOTTATHIL HOUSE, MELAMPARA KARA, THALAPPALAM VILLAGE.
BY ADV. P R VENKITESH
RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIM PETITIONER & DEFENDANT:
1. THE SECRETARY,PERUANTHANAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.K.186, PERUVANTHANAM.
2. THOMAS, S/O THOMMAN, RRESIDING AT NELLICKAL HOUSE, AINCOMPU KARA, VELLILAPPALLY VILLAGE, KADANADU.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) R2 BY ADVS.SRI.T.V.ANANTHAN SRI.C.D.JOSE
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2013, ALONG WITH AS. 228/1997, THE COURT ON THE SAMEDAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
LSN
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & B.KEMAL PASHA, JJ.
.................................................................... A.S.No. 229 of 1997
.................................................................... Dated this the 12th day of February, 2013. JUDGMENT
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has been instructed by the appellant in this appeal that he does not intend to prosecute this appeal.
Hence, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
sd/- (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE)
sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)
AMV
Anto Mamkoottam
The Secretary, Peranthanam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.
Thomas
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
B. Kemal Pasha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court