Nafeesa v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition (Criminal) was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the Writ Petition as not pressed.
The Writ Petition (Criminal) was not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the Writ Petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/15TH JYAISHTA 1934
WP(Crl.).No. 135 of 2012 (S)
PETITIONER(S):
NAFEESA, AGED 31 YEARS AGE 31 W/O.SHELLY NALAKATH HOUSE CHIRANELLOOR P.O ELAVALLY VILLAGE CHAVAKKAD TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT
BY ADVS.SRI.HRITHWIK
SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
RESPONDENT(S):
BY A.D.G.P. SRI.TOM JOSE PADINJAREKKARA.(R1 TO R3) BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT (R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 0506-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
W.P.(Crl) No.135 of 2012
Dated 5th June, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
K.T.Sankaran, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted, on instructions, that the Writ Petition (Criminal) is not pressed. Accordingly, the Writ Petition (Criminal) is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE.
Sd/-
M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE.
tgs
(true copy)
Nafeesa
The Superintendent of Police
The Circle Inspector of Police
The Sub Inspector of Police
Haseena
K.T.Sankaran
M.L.Joseph Francis
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court