Dr. C.N. Jeevan Raj v. Regionala Provident Fund Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rectified the petitioner’s writ petition challenging a penalty order imposed years ago for PF defaults. The court affirmed the recovery liability but directed payment of the dues in ten equal monthly installments instead of a lump sum.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to remit the amount due in ten equal monthly installments with the first installment payable by 5th December 2012.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/28TH KARTHIKA 1934
WP(C).No. 9972 of 2012 (V)
PETITIONER(S):
DR. C.N. JEEVAN RAJ, AGED 48 YEARS
S/O. LATE C.R.NATARAJAN, 'RAMALAYAM', MONASTRY ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682011.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER
SRI.ANEESH JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. REGIONALA PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KALOOR, KOCHI-682017.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether challenge to recovery order under Employees Provident Fund Act is sustainable when over a decade has passed since the original penalty orders were passed.
Whether the petitioner can be permitted to remit the arrears in installments to avoid discontinuance of recovery proceedings.
Whether demand notice can be quashed due to lack of opportunity to be heard regarding the original penalty orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. C.N. JEEVAN RAJ
- respondent
REGIONALA PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER KALOOR
Coram
HARUN-UL-RASHID
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court