Raveendran Nair v. K.S.E.B.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioners had already received the benefit of promotion, reserving the right to approach the Court for any further entitlement.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to file fresh petition for further entitlement arising from promotion.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M. SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/18TH KARTHIKA 1934
WP(C). No. 9616 of 2006 (T)
PETITIONERS:
1. RAVEENDRAN NAIR, OVERSEER (ELE.) 66 KV. SUB STATION, PALODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. P. AJITHKUMAR, OVERSEER (ELE), ELECTRICAL SECTION, NEDUMANGAD.
BY ADV. SRI. SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTICITY BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (HRM), VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding promotion is maintainable when the petitioners have already received the benefit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raveendran Nair
- petitioner
P. Ajithkumar
- respondent
The Kerala State Electricity Board
- respondent
The Chief Engineer (HRM)
- respondent
B.S. Sanalkumar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court