Raju.D. v. Pattazhi Grama Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2012/4TH SRAVANA 1934
WP(C).No. 7939 of 2008 (T)
PETITIONER(S):
D.RAJU, S/O. DANIEL, ERAYAKKAPOIKA MELETHIL, THAZHATHU VADAKU POYMURI PATTAZHY VADAKKUKARA VILLAGE PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE SMT.P.V.PARVATHI SMT.REENA THOMAS SRI.L.RAM MOHAN
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
1. PATTAZHI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTAZHI P.O. 2. TAHSILDAR, (AUTHORIZED OFFICER R.R.), TALUK OFFICE PATHANAPURAM, PUNALUR.
3. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R.), TALUK OFFICE, PATHANAPURAM. 4. VILLAGE OFFICER, PATTAZHI. * 5. T.K.BASHEER, SHIAZ MANZIL, THRIPPALAZHIKAM POST, KUNDARA, KOLLAM.
**** 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNIKKODE POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.**
*** ADDL.R5 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 9-4-2008 IN I.A.NO.4926/08. ** ADDL.R6 (IMPLEADED SUO MOTU) IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 9-4-2008 IN W.P.(C) NO.7939/2008.**
BY ADVS. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI. P.MOHANDAS (EKM) BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFI.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 7939 of 2008 (T)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :-
| EXT.P1 | : | COPY OF THE NOTICE ATED 25-5-2006 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. |
|---|---|---|
| EXT.P2 | : | COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.C3-7423/07 DATED 1-6-2007 OF THE THIRD RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P3 | : | COPY OF OBJECTIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXT.P1 NOTICE. |
| EXT.P4 | : | COPY OF THE OBJECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXT.P2 BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3. |
| EXT.P5 | : | COPY OF THE ADVOCATE NOTICE DATED 26-09-2007 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER. |
| EXT.P6 | : | COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 21-12-2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. |
| EXT.P7 | : | COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 21-12-2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P8 | : | COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 29-12-2007 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
| EXT.P8(a) | : | COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE AUCTION DAIRY. |
| EXT.P8(b) | : | COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE MINUTES BOOK. |
| EXT.P8(c) | : | COPY OF REGISTER OF RECEIPT. |
| EXT.P8(d) | : | COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 30-5-2006. |
| EXT.P(e) | : | COPY OF AGREEMENT DATED 19-4-2005. |
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A TO JUDGE
amk
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.7939 OF 2008-T
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of July, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
has become infructuous. Submission is recorded. Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
WPC.No.
:2 :
D.RAJU
PATTAZHI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
TAHSILDAR
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR
VILLAGE OFFICER
T.K.BASHEER
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court