Akbar v. Deputy Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition regarding non-collection of entertainment tax. Court closed the petition as the 2nd respondent produced a Government Order exempting the tournament from tax provisions.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed as the tournament is exempted based on Government Order No. 931/2012/ത.സ.ഭ.വ.തയത.28/3/2012. No further consideration required.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2012/26TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 7908 of 2012 (K)
PETITIONER(S):
AKBAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.ABU HAJI, KANDENKATTIL HOUSE, MELE PATTAMBI P.O. 679306,PALAKKAD DIST
BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.SUMODH MADHAVAN NAIR
RESPONDENT(S):
1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH,PALAKKAD-678001
2. PATTAMBI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, P.O.PATTAMBI-679303 PALAKKAD DISTRICT,REP.BY ITS SECRETARY
3. U.UMMER,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 2nd respondent is liable to collect entertainment tax from the organizer of the football tournament.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AKBAR
- respondent
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATH, PALAKKAD
- respondent
PATTAMBI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- respondent
U.UMMER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court