Partly allowed

M.S.Satheesan v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Kerala HC11 Jan 2012WP(C)/764/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala in this writ petition directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation within one month, affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to dispose of the representation within one month after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

M.S.Satheesan Vs Kerala State Road Transport… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2012/21ST POUSHA 1933

¶5

WPC.No. 764 of 2012 (U)

================

PETITIONER:

1 M.S.SATHEESAN,

S/O.SIVARAMAN, MUNDUVELIPARAMBIL, NEENDOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM, SECURITY GUARD, KSRTC DEPOT, CHANGANASSERRY.

¶10

BY ADV.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP

SRI.S.SREEDEV

RESPONDENTS:

==========

1 KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.

¶15

2 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.

¶16

3 CHIEF PERSONAL MANAGER IN CHARGE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADMIN) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.

¶17

SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-01-2012 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C) NO. 764/2012

: 2:

APPENDIXE

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶23

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM DATED 13.12.2011. EXT.P1(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P1. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 11.06.2009

¶24

: TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 11.06.2009 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶25

EXT.P2(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2. EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.12.2002 PREFERRED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P3(a) : TRUE COPY OF THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3.

¶26

: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.12.2002 PREFERRED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

¶27

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE

B.P. RAY, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 764 of 2012

¶33

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11^th day of January, 2012.

¶34

JUDGMENT

¶35

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for KSRTC.

¶36

In this writ petition filed under Artcile 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges Ext.P1 transfer order. He submitted a representation before the 2^nd respondent vide Ext.P3. Let the 2^nd respondent dispose of Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner within one month from today after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner .

¶37

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

¶38

sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE.

O.P. No.

-:2:-

B.P. RAY, J.

O.P.No. 13887 of 2002

¶44

Dated this the 16^th day of November, 2011.

¶45

O.P. No.

¶46

-:3:-

¶47

JUDGMENT

M.S.Satheesan v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.S.Satheesan v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Vijayakumari Vs State of Kerala

G.Rethinam Thomas Vs the Secretary, Munnar Grama Panchayath

Kittan Narayanan Vs Union of India

C.P.Rajagopalan Vs Hmt Ltd.

Pushpangadan Vs Addl.District Magistrate

C.K.Rasheed Vs the State of Kerala