V.P.Ramachandran v. Kseb
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an order for electricity disconnection. While dismissing the challenge to the impugned order, the court directed the petitioner to settle a specific amount as per an interim order.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to pay Rs.5,000 already paid plus balance in four equal monthly instalments from April 1, 2012; no interest if paid, otherwise 12% interest on default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/15TH PHALGUNA 1933
WP(C).No. 6028 of 2004 (P)
PETITIONER(S):
V.P. RAMACHANDRAN, VALIYAVEETTIL, MOOLAVATTOM, KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.KOSHY GEORGE SRI.ALEX GEORGE SRI.GEORGE ZACHARIAH ERUTHICKEL
RESPONDENT(S):
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHUTHA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
- ELECTRICAL DIVISION, PALLOM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of disconnection of electricity supply should be quashed or modified.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief regarding the void declaration of Adjustment Invoice P2.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.P. RAMACHANDRAN
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Coram
B.P.RAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court