K.Abdurahiman v. State of Kerala and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner on the day it was finally heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/15TH BHADRA 1934
WP(C).No. 5578 of 2010 (V) --------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
K.ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.KUTTU HAJI, KIZHINJALIL HOUSE, P.O.ALAMKODE, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM, DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA SMT.V.K.SHEMEENA SRI.M.S.UNNIKRISHNAN (OASIS)
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
1. STATE OF KERALA,
2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF TAXES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM.
5. THE TAHSILDAR,
6. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, VAT CIRCLE, PONNANI, MALAPPURAM.
7. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
BY ADV.SRI.SHAI RAJ.T.K., GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.5578 OF 2010(v)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of September, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not
pressing the writ petition. Submission is recorded. Writ petition is
dismissed as not pressed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
WPC.No.
:2 :
K. Abdurahiman
State of Kerala
Antony Dominic
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court