The High Court of Kerala dismissed W.P.(C).No.5382 of 2006 as infructuous on the submission of the petitioners' counsel that the subject matter of the writ petition had ceased to exist or become impotent.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/4TH ASWINA 1934
WP(C).No. 5382 of 2006 (N)
PETITIONER(S):
1. P.P.MOIDEENKUTTY, S/O. MOHAMMEDKUTTY, PADINJAREPEEDIYAKKAL HOUSE, MUNNIYUR, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
2. N.SANKARAN, S/O.PADMANABHAN, NEDIYAMKANDATHIL HOUSE, P.O.VALLIKUNNU, MALAPPURAM.
3. T.HAMZA, THOOMBATH HOUSE, P.O.PARAPUR, KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHEIF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, (TAXATION OFFICER),MALAPPURAM.
3. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, (TAXATION OFFICER), TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAPPANGADI POLICE STATION, PARAPPANANGADI, MALAPPURAM.
R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. REZIYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
W.P.(C)No.5382 of 2006
Dated this the 26th day of September, 2012
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter
has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
P.P.MOIDEENKUTTY
N.SANKARAN
T.HAMZA
THE STATE OF KERALA
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, MALAPPURAM
THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, TIRUR
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
