In this writ petition filed by M/S. New Rajasthan Marbles, the Hon'ble Court dismissed the petition. The Court held that the legal issue raised is fully covered by a prior decision (K.M.P.Timbers & Saw Mills) which was adverse to the petitioner's position.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012/6TH ASWINA 1934
WP(C).No. 4621 of 2007 (A)
PETITIONER(S):
M/S. NEW RAJASTAN MARBLES, PARAKULAM, KOTTIYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER - MR. VISHNU BHAKTHAN.
BY ADV. SRI.K.J.ABRAHAM.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,
TRIVANDRUM.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, TRIVANDRUM.
4. THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR, COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST,
MANJESWAR, KASARGODE.
BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.T.K. SHAIJ RAJ.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-09-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 4621 of 2007 (A)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXT.P1 COPY OF THE INVOICE NO.9240729693 DATED 31/01/2007. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AI 1454/06-07 DATED 05/02/2007.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
rs.
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.4621 OF 2007(A)
--------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 28th day of September, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Issue raised in this writ petition is fully covered against the
petitioner in view of the decision reported in K.M.P.Timbers & Saw
Mills V. Commercial Inspector (2012(50)VST) 195. Therefore, the
writ petition is dismissed.
(ANTONY DOMINIC) JUDGE
vi/
WPC.No.
:2 :
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed given that the legal issue is fully covered against the petitioner in a prior reported decision?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.M.P.Timbers & Saw Mills V. Commercial InspectorFollowed¶33
K.M.P.Timbers & Saw Mills V. Commercial Inspector (2012(50)VST) 195
M/S. NEW RAJASTAN MARBLES
STATE OF KERALA
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, COMMERCIAL TAXES
THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
THE COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
