The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging actions by the Regional Transport Authority. The court found that the underlying matter had become infructuous and dismissed the petition on that ground during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2012/26TH POUSHA 1933
WPC.No. 3685 of 2006 (L)
PETITIONER(S):
PRADEEPKUMAR, S/O.DAMODARAN NAIR, MUNDATHIYIL HOUSE, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AT CALICUT
2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. VIJU LAL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-01-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SD
P.R.RAMACHANDRAMENON.J.
WP(C) NO:3685 OF 2006
Dated this the 16 day of January, 2012
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
P.R.RAMACHANDRAMENON,JUDGE
AV
PRADEEPKUMAR, S/O.DAMODARAN NAIR
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
