B.Kasthuri.a.Pai v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed regarding shifting of an expired toddy shop licence closed without prejudice to contentions raised as the licence had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JULY 2012/12TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 3359 of 2009 (Y)
PETITIONER(S):
BY ADVS.SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO
RESPONDENT(S):
BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN
BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SAREENA GEORGE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
........................................ W.P.(C).3359/2009
.............................................. Dated this the 3rd day of July, 2012
JUDGMENT
The writ petition was filed in 2009 seeking a direction to respondents 1 to 5 to shift the Toddy Shop run by the sixth respondent. The licence was for a period of one year and therefore the licence that was issued to the sixth respondent has expired. Even otherwise, according to the petitioners, shop is not functioning in the objectionable location.
Therefore, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions raised.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
mrcs
/true copy/ PA To Judge
B.KASTHURI.A.PAI
A. SATHISH
STATE OF KERALA
THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, TRIVANDRUM
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE KASARAGOD
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KASARAGOD
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court