The petitioner contended that relief was obtained via interim order. The court disposed of the writ petition in terms of the interim order without further elaboration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/5TH ASHADHA 1934
WP(C).No. 3288 of 2012 (I)
PETITIONER(S):
1. M.I.SHIHABUDDIN, AGED 36 YEARS MANATHUVADAKKEPUTHENPURAYIL THRIKKAKKARA P.O ERNAKULAM
2. SUBIN JACOB
BY ADV. SRI.P. DEEPAK
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
2. THE SECRETARY
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.P.PADMALAYAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 3288 of 2012 (I) --------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:-
| EXT.P1 TRUE COPY |
OF THE REGULAR PERMIT VALID TILL 25/3/2012 |
|---|---|
| EXT.P2 TRUE COPY |
OF ORDER DATED 25/7/2011 IN WPC 19703/2011 |
| EXT.P3 TRUE COPY |
OF THE CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE DATED 17/8/2011 |
| EXT.P4 TRUE COPY |
OF THE JOINT APPLICATION DATED 5/1/2012 |
| EXT.P5 TRUE COPY |
OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 6/1/2012 |
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL.
( TRUE COPY )
PA TO JUDGE
Kvs/-
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
= = = = = = = = = = = = = WP(C).No.3288 of 2012.
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 26th June, 2012.
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
relief sought in this writ petition has already been obtained by the petitioner pursuant to the interim order passed in
this case. This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the
said interim order.
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, (Judge)
Kvs/-
M.I.Shihabuddin
Subin Jacob
The Regional Transport Authority
The Secretary
K.Surendra Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
