K.Sreekumar v. Regional Transport Officer Trivandrum
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/8TH CHAITHRA 1934
WP(C).No. 3221 of 2010 (C)
PETITIONER:
K.SREEKUMAR, KATTIL VEEDU, EDAVAKKODU, SREEKARYAM, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.M.HUSSAIN.
RESPONDENTS:
1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, TRIVANDRUM.
2. DEPUTY THAHASILDAR (RR), TRIVANDRUM.
3. RAJAN, S/O THAMPI, KEEZHEVILA VEEDU, KIZHAKKUMKARA DESAM, ATTIPRA VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM.
R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. P.A. RAZIYA.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Prv.
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
W.P.(C)No.3221 of 2010
Dated this the 28th day of March, 2012
JUDGMENT
Notice was issued in this writ petition on 01.02.2010. However, notice to the third respondent was returned with the endorsement “No such person”. It is also seen that despite an opportunity was given to cure the defect, the defect was not cured and it is therefore that the case is posted today. Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation for the petitioner. In such circumstances, the writ petition will stand dismissed for non prosecution.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
K.SREEKUMAR
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, EAST FORT, TRIVANDRUM
DEPUTY THAHASILDAR (RR), TRIVANDRUM
RAJAN, S/O THAMPI, KEEZHEVILA VEEDU, KIZHAKKUMKARA DESAM, ATTIPRA VILLAGE, TRIVANDRUM
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court