Muthalif v. Kseb
Case brief
What is this about?
In a petition challenging a provisional assessment order and letter consequent upon a surprise inspection, the Court allowed time for the petitioner to file objections and directed that electricity not be disconnected pending disposal.
What did the court decide?
Time allowed for filing objections; direction to allow hearing and delay electricity disconnection; further proceedings within two weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/13TH MAGHA 1933
WPC.No. 2793 of 2012 (Y)
PETITIONER:
MUTHALIF
S/O. ABDUL KHADER, RESIDING AT NOUSHAD MANZIL VATTATHARA, MADAPPALLY, P.O.MUKUNDAPURAM KOLLAM-681 585.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.S.MANU SRI.S.K.PREMRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
- KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
- ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, THEVALAKKARA, KOLLAM-690 524.
- SUB ENGINEER
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUTHALIF
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Coram
B.P.RAY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court