Raveendran Pillai v. West Kallada Grama Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/18TH JYAISHTA 1934
WP(C).No. 2628 of 2012 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
1. RAVEENDRAN PILLAI,
2. AMMINI AMMA,
VILANTHARA P.O., VALIYAPPADAM, KARALIMUKKU,
BY ADVS.SRI.PRAKASH P.GEORGE SRI.B.PREMNATH SRI.ACHUTH KYLAS
RESPONDENT(S):
1. WEST KALLADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
2. THE SECRETARY,
3. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER,
4. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,
5. SHANAVAS
R4 BY ADV.SRI.M.MOHAMMED SHAFI, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R1 & R2 BY ADV.SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL R3 BY ADVS.SRI.M.AJAY, SC, K S P C BOARD
SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR R5 BY ADVS.SRI.DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD BY ADV. SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) BY ADV. SRI.ANOOP.V.NAIR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-06-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DG
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
W.P.(C)No.2628 of 2012
Dated this the 08th day of June, 2012
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between themselves and the fifth respondent has been amicably settled and therefore, he seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
Raveendran Pillai
Ammi Amma
West Kallada Grama Panchayath
The Secretary, West Kallada Grama Panchayath
The Environmental Engineer, Kerala State Pollution Control Board
District Medical Officer
Anton Dominic
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court