G.Satheesh v. the Regional Transport Authority
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner sought a direction for the immediate issue of a varied permit. The respondents agreed to settle timings within a month, and the petition was accordingly dismissed. The order contained no substantive reasoning or case law.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/22ND AGRAHAYANA 1934
WP(C).No. 22337 of 2012 (N)
PETITIONER:
G.SATHEESH, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.VASUDEVAN, 4/284 (2/284), SARADHI NIVAS, KAVUNDIKKAL P.O., AGALI, MANNARKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL.
RESPONDENTS:
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for immediate issuance of a varied permit after the statutory authority agreed to settle timings within a month.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.SATHEESH
- respondent
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court