Petitioner sought appointment to a vacant tradesman post based on a selection list. Respondent argued the rank list had expired and no representation was filed. Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution without substantive ruling on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/13TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
WP(C).No. 17367 of 2010 (U)
PETITIONER:
BINU THOMAS, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.THANKAPPAN, RESIDING AT KANDATHIL HOUSE, PANGAPPARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.SURESH SRI.G.SUDHEER
RESPONDENT(S): --------------
1. SREE CHITHRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. MEENAMBIKA.V.S,TRADESMAN, DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION,SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PAPPANAMCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC, SREE CHITRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE R2 BY ADV. SRI.D.KISHORE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
W.P. (C) NO. 17367 of 2010
Dated this the 4th day of December, 2012
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court, seeking for a
direction to be given to the first respondent to implement Ext.P2 Selection and to appoint the petitioner to the 3rd vacancy to the post of Tradesman (Electronics) in the Department of Electronics
and Communication, in the service of the first respondent.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
AS
BINU THOMAS
SREE CHITHRA THIRUNAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
MEENAMBIKA.V.S
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
