The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the underlying matter had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/29TH JYAISHTA 1934
WP(C).No. 148 of 2009 (P)
PETITIONERS:
1. A.P.VARGHESE, PROPRIETOR, M/S.ST.GEORGE ENTERPRISES,KARUKUTTY.P.O KARAYAMPARAMBU, ERNAKULAM.
2. NEENA VARGHESE, W/O.A.P.VARGHESE, PYNADATH AYYAMPILLIL, PULIYANOM.P.O, PEECHANIKAD, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM.
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LA), SLAO & COMPETENT AUTHORITY, N.H.D.P, CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR-20.
2. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR,CHEMBAKAVU, THRISSUR-20.
3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA), NHDP, UNIT NO.III, CHEMBUKAVU, THRISSUR-20.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19.6.2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
VK
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
........................................ W.P.(C).148/2009
.............................................. Dated this the 19th day of June, 2012
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the matter has become infructuous.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
mrcs
/true copy/ PA To Judge
A.P.VARGHESE
NEENA VARGHESE
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR(LA), SLAO & COMPETENT AUTHORITY
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA)
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
