Dismissed

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/S.Sanjeevani Samithi

Kerala HC6 Nov 2012WP(C)/10855/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court held the writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner not maintainable, relying on a previous decision. It declared that disposing of this petition does not preclude the organization from challenging the order if they possess the right to do so. The petition was disposed of without further orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of.

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012/15TH KARTHIKA 1934

¶5

WP(C).No. 10855 of 2011 (F)

¶6

PETITIONER(S):

¶7

EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, REPRESENTED BY ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895, KALOOR COCHIN-682 017.

¶8

BY ADVS.DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) SRI.M.CHANDRA BOSE

¶9

RESPONDENT(S):

¶10

THE SECRETARY, M/S.SANJEEVANI SAMITHI, CHERPU,-680561 THRISSUR DISTRICT KERALA STATE.

¶11

R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.T.C.KRISHNA

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-11-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

WP(C).No. 10855 of 2011 (F)

¶14

APPENDIX

¶15

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶16

P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COVERAGE NOTICE DATED 11.6.2009

¶17

P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROFORMA OF COVERAGE.

¶18

P3: TRUE COPY OF THE 7A PROCEEDINGS DATED 9.7.2010

¶19

P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE EPF ATA NO.617(7) 2010 DATED 17.1.2011

¶20

P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ENQUIRY DATED 9.7.2010

¶21

P6: TRUE COPY OF THE ATTENDANCE REGISTER.

¶22

P7: TRUE COPY OF THE COMBINED EMPLOYMENT STRENGTH OF TWO INSTITUTIONS.

¶23

P8: TRUE COPY OF PROFORMA A STATEMENT FROM 1/2005 TO 1/2010.

¶24

P9: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN ATA NO.810(7) 2005 DATED 27.9.2005.

¶25

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A. TO JUDGE.

dlk

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No. 10855 of 2011 - F --------------------------------------------------Dated this the 6^th November, 2012

¶31

J U D G M E N T

¶32

The writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner is not maintainable as held in the decision in

¶33

Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner v. West Coast Petroleum Agency (2012 (1) K.L.T. 704).

¶34

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is open for the Organization to challenge it. Disposal of this writ petition shall not preclude the Organization if they have got a right to challenge the impugned order.

¶35

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶36

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

¶37

rka

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/S.Sanjeevani Samithi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/S.Sanjeevani Samithi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.K. Kunjamma Vs A.E. Jacob

Jalaludheen Vs the District Collector,Tvm

George Paulose Vs Corporation Bank

Brite Power Launders and House Keeping Vs the Regional Transport Officer Ernakulam

Susamma Vs Senior Geologist

E.M.Abdul Khader Vs Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner