P.C.Abdul Salam v. Rdo
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged coercive proceedings initiated for payment of building tax despite pending revision. Court dismissed writ petition allowing respondents to proceed if liability remains after one month.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to respondents to proceed against petitioner for remaining balance within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/24TH PHALGUNA 1933
WP(C).No. 10679 of 2005 (U)
PETITIONER(S) :
P.C.ABDUL SALAM, MUMTHAZ MANZIL, KARUVANCHERY, NILESHWAR.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR)
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KANHANGAD.
2. THE TAHASILDAR, HOSDURG.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.C. Abdul Salam
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Office, Kanhangad
- respondent
The Tahasildar, Hosdurg
- respondent
The District Collector, Kasaragod
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court