Santhimadam Builders v. Commercial Tax Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2012/12TH MAGHA 1933
WPC.No. 1049 of 2012 (E)
PETITIONER(S):
SANTHIMADAM BUILDERS THEKKE NALUVAZHI, NORTH PARUR REPRESENTED BY SRI.V.N.RADHAKRISHNAN,CHAIRMAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.VIJAYAN. K.U. SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN
SRI.P.K.GEEVARGHESE
RESPONDENT(S):
1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (WC<),O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY.
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether recovery proceedings initiated pursuant to demand notices issued after a compounding rejection order are maintainable while appeals against that order are pending?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SANTHIMADAM BUILDERS THEKKE NALUVAZHI
- respondent
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (WC&LT),O/O THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY
- respondent
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)-COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM
- respondent
INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES, MATTANCHERRY
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court