This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012/25TH SRAVANA 1934
RSA.NO. 859 OF 2004 ( )
AS.308/2001 OF SECOND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM OS.2036/1999 OF FIRST ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 PLAINTIFFS :
1. MRS. MALATHY BALAGOPAL, W/O. THOTTEKKAT BALAGOPALA MENON, ANUGRAHA TASS ROAD, ALUVA.
2. MRS. SUSMITHA VENUGOPAL, D/O. THOTTEKKAT BALAGOPALA MENON, DO.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SRI.N.M.MADHU
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 DEFENDANTS:
1. MRS. MINI SIVAN, AGED 42, RECHANA, MANITHARA P.O., AVANOOR, THRISSUR-680 547.
2. MR. MOHANDAS, NOW ALLEGED TO BE CONDUCTING REAL ESTATE BUSINESS IN BUILDING NO.39/1986, CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
3. SOMAN, NOW ALLEGED TO BE CONDUCTING REAL ESTATE BUSINESS IN BUILDING NO.39/1986 CHITTOOR ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
4. MRS. SUJATHA SIVASANKAR, D/O. THOTTEKKAT BALAGOPALA MENON, ANUGRAHA TASS ROAD, ALUVA.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER PETER R1
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD 16.08.2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
==================================== R.S.A. No.859 of 2004
====================================
Dated this the 16th day of August, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the appeal has
become infructuous and hence the same may be dismissed
accordingly.
The Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
All pending Interlocutory Applications will stand dismissed.
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.
vsv
Mrs. Malathy Balagopal
Mrs. Susmitha Venugopal
Mrs. Mini Sivan
Mr. Mohandas
Soman
Mrs. Sujatha Sivasankar
Thomas P. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
