V.Ranjith v. Natarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal challenged the dismissal of a suit and granting of a counter-claim decree. The court found no substantial question of law, as findings of fact regarding the nature of the cheque payment were not open to respectful difference.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/17TH JYAISHTA 1934
R.S.A.No. 679 of 2012 (E)
AS.50/2004 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL, DATED 29-10-2011. O.S.293/2002 OF MUNSIFF COURT, VARKALA.
APPELLANT(S):
V.RANJITH, S/O VISWANATHAN NAIR, MADHAVAPURAMON DESOM, ELAKAMON DESOM, AYIROOR VILLAGE, PIN - 695 310.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SMT.GEETHA P.MENON SRI.N.AJITH SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN.
RESPONDENT(S):
NATARAJAN, S/O KUNJURAMAN, PUTHENVEEDU, KAPPIL DESOM, EDAVA VILLAGE AND POST, PIN - 695 311.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal presents any substantial question of law requiring a decision of this court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.RANJITH
- respondent
NATARAJAN
Coram
THOMAS P. JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court