Janardhanan v. Aniyankunju
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of a suit for prohibitory injunction due to inability to identify the suit property's boundaries and lack of substantial question of law.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE 2012/23RD JYAISHTA 1934
RSA.NO. 629 OF 2012 ()
AS.45/2008 OF SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA OS.730/1999 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
JANARDHANAN S/O.KUNJUPANICKAN, KUNNAMPALLIL PARAMBIL THALAVADY SOUTH P.O., THALAVADY, ALAPPUZHADISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1. ANIYANKUNJU
S/O.KUNJUPANICKEN, KUNNAMPALLIL PARAMBIL THALAVADY SOUTH P.O., THALAVADY ALAPPUZHADISTRICT. 689723.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a decree for prohibitory injunction should be granted where the suit property is not identifiable from survey plans.
Whether the lower courts committed legal infirmity in refusing to grant a decree at least for the portion of land in the appellant's possession.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Janardhanan
- respondent
Aniyankunju
- respondent
Jalaja
- respondent
Sarasamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court