Jois K.George v. George
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against injunction awarded over apprehended obstruction of water flow through a public channel (thodu). Court held no substantial question of law arose and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed; all pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2012/1ST JYAISHTA 1934
RSA.No. 616 of 2012 ()
AS.215/2009 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR OS.191/2007 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
- JOIS K.GEORGE, AGED 25, S/O.GEORGE, KAPPADAKKAMADATHIL HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE, CHUNDAKUZHY P.O. - 683 546, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
- GEORGE PAUL, AGED 54, S/O.POULOSE, KAPPADAKKAMADATHIL HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE, CHUNDAKUZHY P.O. - 683 546, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
GEORGE, AGED 51, S/O.KURIAKOSE, THACHETHUKUDY HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA KARA, VENGOOR WEST VILLAGE, CHUNDAKUZHY P.O. - 683 546, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
JOIS K.GEORGE
- appellant
GEORGE PAUL
- respondent
GEORGE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court