Wilson v. Cherian
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal was dismissed due to non-prosecution by the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/16TH PHALGUNA 1933
RSA.No. 374 of 2005 (C)
AS.177/2001 OF DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR
OS.275/1990 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT,WADAKKANCHERRY
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.1/PLAINTIFF:
WILSON, S/O.KOLADI CHUMMAR, KANIYARKODE VILLAGE, TALAPPILLY TALUK REPRESENTED THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER VAREED, S/O.CHUMMAR, KOLADY HOUSE THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.SAJITH KUMAR KANGHINGHAT
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENT NO.2/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
WILSON, S/O.KOLADI CHUMMAR
- respondent
CHERIYAN, S/O.KALATHILVEETTIL ISSAC
Coram
THOMAS P. JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court